The Nonprofit Marketing Blog

Understanding the Value of Multichannel Fundraising

Multi-channel fundraising.  Many nonprofits are doing this, and doing it well.  But thousands still aren’t.  Some have a long history of successful direct mail programs, but little to speak of in the way of Internet fundraising.  Or maybe there’s an Internet fundraising program — but it’s entirely separate from and unique to the direct mail program.

The results however, are crystal clear.  Integrating your direct mail and online fundraising programs can yield significant increases in overall revenue.

It did for us.

In December of 2008 we conducted our typical year-end direct mail campaign.  However, we added an e-mail component as well.  Our direct mail dropped the last week of November, and our e-mails began dropping the first week of December.

The e-mail campaign proved to be a very valuable suplement to our traditionally single-channel marketing efforts.

Adding the online channel helped us raise 40% more revenue at year-end than we would have if we had only used direct mail.

In addition to increasing our overall revenue, the multi-channel approach allowed us to reach donors that we otherwise might not have been able to get to.  We received a batch of gifts in the mail (checks that came in the year-end direct mail envelopes), but instead of receiving direct mail reply devices with these gifts, the envelopes included printed copies of our e-mail solicitation.  These gifts totaled almost $10,000.

One of the things we’ve put significant energy and focus into (and I recommend you do the same) is to ensure that your online and offline efforts are fully integrated.  Consistent messaging, creative and offers will help create a synergy between your marketing channels and likely create an overall lift in your program performance.

Here’s another interesting fact that might help you better understand the value of multi-channel communication to your constituents.  We just tabulated results from an eight month period of time for two sets of donors:  one group that was not receiving our e-communications (control), and another group that was receiving our e-communications on a regular basis (test).

Over that eight month period, donors receiving our e-mail communications performed significantly higher (across all channels — this was not limited to online giving).   The test group made contributions 9% more frequently than did the control group, and their average gift size was 118% larger than the control group.

This article was originally posted on the Nonprofit Strategies blog by Andrew Olsen of Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare.

About The Author

Andrew Olsen is a Certified Fund Raising Executive, currently leading direct response fundraising efforts at Gillette Children’s Specialty Healthcare in St. Paul, Minnesota. He was recently awarded a 2009 Gold Quill Award for Excellence by the International Association of Business Communicators for leading the strategic redesign of Gillette’s newsletter program, resulting in more than 1,000% increase in both response rate and income for this program.

Raise More This Year with Smarter Fundraising Software

Learn More

Share your thoughts!

Join the conversation to offer your insight and experience. Have a question? We’d love to hear it!

About This Blog

Amanda Khoury
Marketing Manager

We’re here to help you win hearts and minds—and donations.

Read More

Want to raise more money and learn how to market your cause with bigger impact? You’re in the right place! The Nonprofit Marketing Blog is managed by our team of experts here at Network for Good. We’re here to bring you the best in nonprofit marketing trends, fundraising techniques, technology developments, and amazing nonprofit examples.

Want to be a better nonprofit marketer and fundraiser? Get alerts for free tips, key content, and other training opportunities.